facebook pixel
Blog Articles

North Dakota Pay Transparency Laws: Complete Compliance Guide

This guide explores the current legal framework in North Dakota, including the state's Equal Pay Act and federal laws like the Equal Pay Act of 1963.

Lucy Leonard

by Lucy Leonard - April 22nd, 2025

Pay transparency has become a growing priority across many states, reshaping how employers approach hiring and compensation. Changes in legislation are aimed at reducing pay gaps and ensuring fairness, but not every state has adopted these practices. Knowing where each state stands is key for employers who want to remain compliant and maintain equitable policies.

North Dakota employers may not face the same pay transparency requirements seen in other states, but they are still subject to important laws that address equity in the workplace. Both state and federal regulations set clear guidelines for fair compensation practices, even without additional transparency rules.

This guide explores the current legal framework in North Dakota, including the state's Equal Pay Act and federal laws like the Equal Pay Act of 1963. Employers who understand these regulations can better align their practices and avoid compliance risks.

North Dakota Overview and Current Legal Landscape

North Dakota does not have any active laws requiring employers to disclose salary ranges, prohibit inquiries into salary history, or mandate other pay transparency measures. Without these provisions, employers in the state are not subject to the same rules that have been enacted in jurisdictions like Colorado or California.

The North Dakota Equal Pay Act, however, remains enforceable and prohibits wage discrimination based on gender. This law requires employers to pay employees of different genders equally for performing comparable work under similar conditions. Employers must take care to evaluate pay practices to ensure compliance with this regulation.

Federal laws also apply to all employers in North Dakota. The Equal Pay Act of 1963, for example, prohibits gender-based wage discrimination for employees performing jobs that require equal skill, effort, and responsibility. Compliance with federal requirements is non-negotiable, making it necessary for employers to review their pay structures regularly.

Equal Pay Act in North Dakota

North Dakota's equal pay law focuses specifically on gender-based pay equity. Employers must pay employees of different genders equally when they perform comparable work. Comparable work refers to roles that require the same level of skill, effort, and responsibility under similar working conditions. The law addresses gender disparities but does not include protections tied to other characteristics such as race, age, or disability.

Federal law under the EPA reinforces these requirements and adds another layer of accountability. While the state law ensures gender pay equity, the EPA outlines permissible exceptions for wage differences, such as merit-based pay or variations tied to production output. These federal guidelines apply to all employers, regardless of state-specific laws, and act as a broader safety net for employees.

Employers in North Dakota must align their pay practices with both state and federal regulations. For example, a pay disparity between male and female employees in the same position must be clearly justified using objective factors like seniority or measurable performance. Without a valid explanation, employers risk noncompliance.

Compared to states with broader pay transparency laws, North Dakota offers employers more flexibility. There are no mandates requiring salary range disclosures or restrictions on asking about salary history during hiring. While this approach grants employers more control, it can also increase the risk of unintentional pay inequities. Businesses must remain vigilant to avoid wage gaps that could trigger legal scrutiny.

Operating in multiple states adds another layer of complexity. Employers accustomed to complying with more expansive laws in states like Colorado or New York may find North Dakota’s regulations less demanding. However, implementing consistent pay equity practices across all locations can help reduce risks and create a fairer workplace overall. Conducting regular pay audits ensures compliance and promotes transparency, even in states without explicit requirements.

Potential Legislation and Recent Discussions

North Dakota has seen minimal legislative movement on pay transparency laws, but discussions around wage equity occasionally surface. While no active bills currently address salary disclosures or restrictions on pay history inquiries, employers should not assume the status quo will remain indefinitely. Legislative trends from other states often shape future proposals, even in regions with historically limited regulations.

Employers hiring in North Dakota or managing multi-state teams should stay proactive. Legislative developments in neighboring states with robust pay transparency requirements could create ripple effects. Preparing for possible changes can prevent rushed adjustments later.

Here's what employers can do now to stay ahead:

  • Track legislative updates: Keep a record of new proposals or conversations related to North Dakota pay transparency and wage equity laws.

  • Standardize pay practices: Use consistent salary ranges and clear compensation guidelines across all locations.

  • Conduct regular audits: Review internal pay structures to ensure fair compensation aligned with both state and federal laws.

Even without existing state mandates, transparent pay practices help reduce disparities and build trust with employees. Staying informed ensures compliance with current laws and prepares employers for potential changes down the line.

Understanding Pay Transparency vs. Pay Equity

Pay transparency and pay equity address compensation fairness but in distinct ways. While both focus on reducing wage disparities, they tackle separate aspects of how employees are paid and informed about compensation. Employers need to understand and apply both concepts effectively to foster a fair workplace.

Pay equity ensures that employees performing similar work receive equal pay regardless of factors like gender, race, or other protected characteristics. For example, a company must pay two employees with comparable roles and qualifications the same wage unless clear, measurable factors like seniority or performance justify a difference. This approach directly addresses wage discrimination and focuses on fairness in compensation practices.

Pay transparency, on the other hand, emphasizes openness about compensation. It involves sharing information like salary ranges, pay scales, or how wages are determined. Transparency doesn't dictate what employees earn but instead focuses on making the process visible. For instance, employers might include salary ranges in job postings or explain how raises are calculated. Providing this information reduces uncertainty and builds trust between employees and employers.

Key Differences

To clarify the distinction:

  • Pay equity ensures fairness in what employees earn for similar work.

  • Pay transparency offers insight into how compensation decisions are made and communicated.

While separate, these concepts work hand-in-hand. Pay equity creates fair compensation policies, while transparency ensures employees understand and trust the process.

Simple Steps to Boost Transparency

Even without state-mandated pay transparency, employers can take straightforward actions to improve clarity around compensation. Transparent practices promote trust, reduce misunderstandings, and help avoid disputes over pay.

  • Include salary ranges in job descriptions: Specify minimum and maximum pay for roles to set clear expectations.

  • Explain how pay is calculated: Outline factors like experience, performance, or market benchmarks that influence wages.

  • Conduct regular pay audits: Review and adjust pay structures to ensure they align with company policies and market rates.

  • Train managers on compensation policies: Equip supervisors to answer employee questions about pay with confidence and accuracy.

These steps not only enhance transparency but also strengthen employee confidence in the organization's commitment to fair and open compensation practices.

Federal and Regional Influences

Federal regulations provide the core framework for pay equity and transparency across the United States. Employers in North Dakota must adhere to the Equal Pay Act (EPA), which requires equal wages for employees performing jobs with comparable skill, effort, and responsibility. This federal mandate applies regardless of whether a state has additional pay transparency laws. Employers should regularly review pay structures to ensure they align with these requirements.

For businesses operating near North Dakota’s borders, understanding regional pay laws is just as important. Neighboring states like Minnesota and Montana have different approaches to pay regulations, which can complicate compliance for multi-state employers.

Steps for Multi-State Compliance

To maintain compliance across state lines, employers can focus on specific actions to simplify pay practices:

  1. Review pay policies for each state: Evaluate how state-specific laws impact hiring and compensation processes, particularly in border regions.

  2. Standardize equity reviews: Use clear, measurable benchmarks to ensure pay equity across all locations. This reduces the risk of wage disparities.

  3. Train HR and hiring teams: Educate teams on the differences in state pay laws to ensure accurate and lawful recruiting practices.

  4. Monitor legal updates by state: Track changes in state legislation to anticipate and address new pay transparency requirements.

By aligning pay practices with both federal standards and regional laws, employers can reduce risks and create consistency across their workforce.

Compliance Steps for North Dakota Employers

Employers in North Dakota should take a thoughtful approach to their pay practices, even without statewide pay transparency mandates. Implementing fair and consistent policies not only reduces compliance risks but also fosters trust among employees. Clear steps can guide businesses to stay aligned with both federal requirements and workplace equity expectations.

Evaluate Current Pay Practices

Begin by thoroughly reviewing how compensation decisions are made within your organization. This ensures that wages are fair and free from unintended bias.

  • Conduct a pay audit: Analyze compensation data across similar roles, departments, and levels. Look for discrepancies that could hint at inequities.

  • Review wage-setting policies: Identify any outdated or inconsistent rules that might unintentionally create pay disparities.

  • Examine influencing factors: Determine if external elements, like prior salary history or informal negotiations, could be skewing pay decisions unfairly.

Document findings and address any inconsistencies to maintain equity and avoid legal challenges.

Create a Voluntary Pay Disclosure Policy

Although North Dakota does not mandate pay transparency, establishing a voluntary disclosure policy can strengthen employee confidence in your compensation practices. Employees value clarity, especially regarding wages.

  • Define clear pay ranges: Base ranges on measurable criteria like job requirements, market comparisons, and performance benchmarks.

  • Communicate pay information: Provide employees and applicants with access to wage ranges through job postings, internal platforms, or handbooks.

  • Clarify regional differences: If your organization operates across multiple states, explain how location-based factors, like cost-of-living adjustments, influence pay ranges.

A voluntary policy sets clear expectations, reduces misunderstandings, and demonstrates a proactive commitment to fairness.

Document Hiring and Compensation Policies

Structured and transparent hiring practices reduce the likelihood of pay discrepancies and create consistency across the organization.

  • Establish salary matrices: Develop detailed frameworks for determining starting pay. Use objective data points like education, skills, and experience to guide decisions.

  • Standardize multi-state policies: For businesses operating in states with transparency laws, align practices across locations to ensure clarity and consistency.

  • Maintain comprehensive records: Keep detailed documentation of hiring and compensation decisions. This creates a clear trail of compliance and fairness if questioned.

Strong documentation supports fair pay practices and simplifies future reviews or audits.

Train HR and Management

Educating HR teams and managers ensures that fair pay practices are applied consistently and confidently across the organization.

  • Teach pay equity principles: Train managers to evaluate compensation using objective criteria. Include guidance on avoiding bias in pay decisions.

  • Eliminate salary history reliance: Even though North Dakota allows salary history questions, avoiding them helps prevent perpetuating inequities.

  • Equip teams for pay discussions: Provide HR and managers with clear, consistent messaging to address employee inquiries about pay ranges or raises effectively.

Training gives managers and HR teams the tools to navigate compensation conversations and maintain fair practices across the board.

Possible Penalties and Enforcement

North Dakota may lack specific penalties tied to pay transparency noncompliance, but that doesn't eliminate accountability for employers. Federal laws, including the EPA, still carry weight and enforce consequences for wage discrimination. Violations can lead to immediate legal and financial repercussions, as well as long-term damage to a company's reputation.

The EEOC actively investigates wage-related complaints. Employers found in violation could face:

  • Legal action: Employees can file lawsuits seeking back pay, damages, or other remedies through the courts.

  • Financial penalties: The EEOC can impose fines for failing to meet federal wage equity standards.

  • Public scrutiny: Media attention and negative public perception can harm an organization's ability to attract and retain top talent.

Even without state-specific pay transparency requirements, fair pay practices remain non-negotiable under federal nondiscrimination laws. Wage complaints, whether valid or not, can still prompt investigations by agencies. Employers should focus on consistent and equitable pay practices to minimize risks.

Ignoring potential risks tied to wage equity doesn't just create financial liability—it undermines employee trust and workplace morale. Proactively aligning compensation policies with federal regulations helps employers avoid unnecessary scrutiny and creates a foundation of fairness within the organization.

Frequently Asked Questions

Pay transparency and equity laws in North Dakota may differ from what you're used to in other states. Here's a straightforward breakdown of common questions employers face when navigating these regulations.

Is North Dakota required to post salary ranges in job listings?

No, employers in North Dakota are not obligated to include salary ranges in job postings. The state does not enforce any laws requiring wage disclosure during the hiring process.

Despite the lack of a mandate, sharing salary ranges voluntarily can create a more open and engaging hiring experience. Providing clear pay expectations upfront sets a positive tone with candidates, reduces negotiation hurdles, and positions your company as a transparent and trustworthy employer.

Are salary history questions banned in North Dakota?

No, there is no prohibition on asking candidates about their salary history in North Dakota. Employers are free to include these inquiries during interviews or on job applications.

However, relying on prior salary information can unintentionally perpetuate pay inequities. Many businesses operating across state lines opt for a no-salary-history approach to streamline practices and align with states that have stricter regulations. Eliminating these questions entirely can simplify compliance and foster fairer compensation practices.

How can an employer prove compliance with pay equity in North Dakota?

Maintaining comprehensive and organized documentation is the most effective way to demonstrate compliance with pay equity requirements. Employers should use clear, measurable criteria to guide pay decisions and ensure records reflect consistent practices.

  • Establish pay ranges for all positions: Base ranges on objective factors like education, experience, and job responsibilities.

  • Keep detailed records of promotions and raises: Document the decision-making process behind every increase to show fairness.

  • Retain up-to-date job descriptions: Outline the duties, qualifications, and expectations tied to each role to justify pay differences if needed.

Conducting regular internal audits of these records ensures pay practices stay consistent and compliant.

Does North Dakota investigate wage discrimination?

Yes, state agencies can investigate wage discrimination complaints filed by employees. If a worker believes they are being paid unfairly based on gender or another protected status, they can request a review of the employer's compensation practices.

Employers found in violation face legal and reputational risks. To mitigate these risks, prioritize pay equity and transparency in your policies. Ensure that wage decisions are based on objective criteria and maintain clear documentation to support compensation structures.

Navigating pay transparency and equity laws can be complex, but taking proactive steps to ensure fairness and compliance is essential for every employer. By understanding the legal landscape, implementing clear policies, and staying informed about legislative changes, you can create a more equitable and transparent workplace for your team. If you're looking for a partner to simplify your HR processes and support your pay equity goals, book a demo with GoCo today to see how we can help.